Latest comments

In response to: How healthy is our economy?

Rick Suarez [Visitor]
So where do we go from here? What is the cure of our current situation? Could we have done better? Is our president out of touch? These are questions that I frequently ask myself but I yet to come up with someone shining the light in the right direction. So what do we do? Do we go to war with the Iranians?... Is that the real reason that we are in Iraq? And at some point take down the Chinese who is the country that we owe the debt to, this way it will be like cleaning out the countries debt and starting all over. Of course let's not forget, that it will probably a new form of government that we will have.

Rick Suarez

PermalinkPermalink 08/08/10 @ 17:18

In response to: Open letter to my Congressman

Robert [Visitor]
I must say i agree with you we have let too many young men die in wars without winning A war.The last time we won we did so because we knew we had to win.But it looks like now we fight to just to kill off the young people. And they wonder why we are a nation of old people.American Deaths in World War 1..117,465.. Deaths in World War(2)..418,500.. Deaths in the Korean War.. 36,516.. Deaths in the Vietnam War.. 58,516..Deaths Irag 4,404. So I'd say we must stop all of this if we are not going to fight to win.
Sorry not good in writing letters to people.By the looks of things the war that we will have In this country we'll be the most damaging of all the war we ever had.and less something changes very dramatically.

PermalinkPermalink 06/02/10 @ 13:48

In response to: Has Glenn Beck turned you off?

Robert [Visitor]
I will admit Glenn Beck gets carried away now and then but I believe he is very truthful in what he tells Us.Just because he does not agree with every body 100% I would not consider him a bad person.we cannot believe that everyone is going to agreeing on everything.As much as the Obama dislike fox news it makes me wonder when I see a post like this one.They would do anything to stop people from watching fox news.
PermalinkPermalink 06/02/10 @ 12:35

In response to: Open letter to Rush Limbaugh, Sean Hannity and Glenn Beck.

Samir (Home Depot) [Visitor]
Pedro, tengo tres horas de estar en tu site y estoy fascinado porque todo lo que dices tiene su link que lo transporta a uno a la fuente que prueba lo que escribes.

Ya envie tu website a todos mis amigos sinceros para comenzar a capacitarlos para la gran tarea que tenemos todos y que cada uno aporte su granito de arena.

Aunque not ienes tus propios films como infowars... TU SI SABES ESCRIBIR... (you are a good writer my friend, please email me the other articles you promised...) y no creo que yo tenga nada para enviarte que sea nuevo para ti aunque quisiera ayudar y tal vez mas adelante.

Voy a seguir leyendo despues de tomarme una sopita porque ya me entro el hambre.

Gracias y escriba pronto!!!

PermalinkPermalink 11/15/09 @ 23:12

In response to: 9-12 March on Washington DC true attendance was one to two million

Here's some video I took of 9-12 from the Mall. I was there from noon to 4 PM.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AcQ8kmxrujs

I was also on the Mall on 1-20. Here's a comparison shot, both done by my wife, from the same spot:

http://www.flickr.com/photos/emjem1963/3937478887/


My response to you:
FAKE PHOTO AND VIDEO! Shame on you for lying too. Lies won't get you anywhere. We will prevail after all the main thing we want is our Freedom back.
PermalinkPermalink 09/20/09 @ 14:29

In response to: A third political party could be the U.S. inevitable solution

Nancy Swedelius [Visitor]
I love your website Pedro. I would like, however, to see more optimism in your articles. We all need to be more confident in what we are doing to right the wrongs in this country. Let's see how many people have actual ideas for solving these issues instead of just ranting on them. You know, the mass strike revolt that is happening right now across our country IS the third party. It's called the Patriot party. Democrats. Republicans, independants and no affiliations folks. We have bonded naturally and we have more numbers than all of the others put together!!!! We believe in God first. Then in Country and family and freedom. That's all it takes. revolt like this one has never happened in this country since it's inception, unless you count the Revolutionary War and the Civil War. It's time to reclaim our country, and we will!!
PermalinkPermalink 09/03/09 @ 10:24

In response to: A third political party could be the U.S. inevitable solution

Perucho [Visitor]
We do not need a third party. We need to do what many Latin-American countries do. Set a number of signatures to allow a candidate with a set of ideas to run for office, let’s say 700,000.
Let us assume there are 11 candidates who got 700,000 signatures (people backing him/her) or more to appoint them to run in their particular party’s proposals.
If in the first round in the votes casted there is no candidate with 51% of all eligible casted votes, than the two who have the most votes go for a second round. In this second round between the two who got the most votes the winner is decided.
PermalinkPermalink 08/31/09 @ 19:24

In response to: Freedom of Speech is already history

creditcard [Visitor] · http://www.creditcardscities.com
Agreed my man, We should have to speak for what we ave in our mind, that's how nations embraces them self. We should take preventive setups for that and make the people relies that come out of your busy life to make our nation the strong one.
PermalinkPermalink 08/07/09 @ 00:47

In response to: Obama coming to America is speculative fiction

insurance quote [Visitor] · http://www.greatinsurancedeal.com
Perhaps its a fairy tale, who knows but one thing for sure during his visits in different Arab countries he admired the mentions of there's and get the favor of some Muslim countries. But sooner or later we'll find out whether he is returning as king or its just another fairy tale.
PermalinkPermalink 08/06/09 @ 23:49

In response to: Is Barack Obama a U.S. citizen?

MADAN [Visitor]
If Obama is not a US citizen and forced to leave the White House, then what happens next. Do we get Bidden and Pelosi?
PermalinkPermalink 07/19/09 @ 09:58

In response to: Have you ever heard of the CFR? “The what?”

LA_Lady [Visitor]
I just thought I'd add a few things for your readers if that's ok?

For those who think the CFR has nothing to do with, or no significant control in our government here are some quotes:

[The CFR] "came to be, in essence, an agency of the United States government. . . There can be no doubt that much of the thinking in the State Department and much of the background of direction of its policies come from the personnel of. . . The Council on Foreign Relations."
Tax Exempt Foundations, Report, 83rd Congress, 2nd Session, 1954

"We shall have world government whether or not we like it… by conquest or consent."
James Warburg (son of CFR founder Paul Warburg, and a member of FDR's "brain trust") testifying before the Senate Foreign Relations Committee on February 17, 1950.

"The Council on Foreign Relations is 'the establishment.' Not only does it have influence and power in key decision-making positions at the highest levels of government to apply pressure from above, but it also announces and uses individuals and groups to bring pressure from below, to justify the high level decisions for converting the U.S. from a sovereign Constitutional Republic into a servile member state of a one-world dictatorship."
Former Congressman John Rarick 1971

"The CFR is the American Branch of a society which originated in England, and which believes that national boundaries should be obliterated, and a one-world rule established."… "a front group for J.P. Morgan and Company in association with the very small American Round Table Group."
Carroll Quigley (Bill Clinton's mentor, Professor of History at Georgetown University, member of the CFR) - "Tragedy & Hope" (1975)

Note: Carroll Quigley wrote "Tragedy & Hope" because he was a member of the CFR and thought they should be praised for what they were trying to do, he was allowed to view papers and documents that only very high members are allowed to see.

"To be perfectly blunt, you could find yourself in trouble dealing with this subject."
Georgetown University Professor Carroll Quigley explained in an interview that his career as a lecturer in the government institution circuit was all but ruined because of the twenty or so pages he had written about the existence of Round Table Groups.

The story of the British connection to the Council on Foreign Relations may be traced back to George Peabody, J.P. Morgan, Andrew Carnegie, Nicholas M. Butler and Col. Edward House -- all who may be described a British loyalists. A Secret Society was established by Cecil Rhodes in connection with Rothschild, Morgan, Carnegie, and Rockefeller. A small highly secret group called the Round Table directed operations.

"The planning of UN can be traced to the 'secret steering committee' established by Secretary [of State, Cordell] Hull in January 1943. All of the members of this secret committee, with the exception of Hull, a Tennessee politician, were members of the Council on Foreign Relations. They saw Hull regularly to plan, select, and guide the labors of the [State] Department's Advisory Committee. It was, in effect, the coordinating agency for all the State Department's postwar planning."
Professors Laurence H. Shoup and William Minter, writing in their study of the CFR, "Imperial Brain Trust: The CFR and United States Foreign Policy." (Monthly Review Press, 1977).

1977 -- The Third Try at World Order is published. Author Harlan Cleveland of the Aspen Institute for Humanistic Studies calls for:
"changing Americans' attitudes and institutions" for "complete disarmament (except for international soldiers)" and "for individual entitlement to food, health and education."

Read that last quote again... individual ENTITLEMENT to Food, HEALTH, and Education.

"Let us face reality. The framers [of the Constitution] have simply been too shrewd for us. They have outwitted us. They designed separate institutions that cannot be unified by mechanical linkages, frail bridges, [or] tinkering. If we are to turn the founders upside down… we must directly confront the Constitutional structure they erected."
James MacGregor Burns, Council on Foreign Relations member, 1984

"Today, America would be outraged if U.N. troops entered Los Angeles to restore order. Tomorrow they will be grateful! This is especially true if they were told that there were an outside threat from beyond, whether real or promulgated, that threatened our very existence. It is then that all peoples of the world will plead to deliver them from this evil. The one thing every man fears is the unknown. When presented with this scenario, individual rights will be willingly relinquished for the guarantee of their well-being granted to them by the World Government."
Henry Kissinger, Bilderberger Conference in Evians, France, 1991 [refering to the riots in LA]

"In my view The Trilateral Commission represents a skillful, coordinated effort to seize control and consolidate the four centers of power -- political, monetary, intellectual, and ecclesiastical. All this is to be done in the interest of creating a more peaceful, more productive world community. What the Trilateralists truly intend is the creation of a worldwide economic power superior to the political governments of the nation-states involved. They believe the abundant materialism they propose to create will overwhelm existing differences. As managers and creators of the system they will rule the future."
"Does it not seem strange to you that these men just happened to be CFR and just happened to be on the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve, that absolutely controls the money and interest rates of this great country without benefit of Congress? A privately owned organization, the Federal Reserve, which has absolutely nothing to do with the United States of America!"
Barry Goldwater - "With No Apologies" (1979)

"Both major political parties are controlled at the top by an international network, represented in the United States by The Council on Foreign Relations."… "ingenious techniques used to deceive the public and create the widespread myth that there is truly a difference in the two parties at the top."… "private organizations based in New York City which formulate and implement U.S. foreign and domestic policy without public knowledge."… "Both parties are infiltrated by Rockefeller people. Some pose as 'conservative' patriots and others wear the 'liberal' label. Every four years, voters are privileged to choose between a CFR Democratic and a CFR Republican, or candidates surrounded by CFR 'advisors.' Voters never realize that they are given no real choice."… "Keep CFR/TC membership lists handy when watching TV and when reading your local newspaper. Note that many of the leading news readers and columnists are CFR members."
Johnny Stewart - F.R.E.E. (Fund to Restore an Educated Electorate) 1979-1980

In the 2008 presidential elections only 3 candidates of the 2 major parties were NOT members of the CFR, BB, or TC.... Dennis Kunicich (D), Mike Gravel (D), and Ron Paul (R). Before the 2008 campaigns Obama and Hillary had "member" pages on the CFR website, but once people started blogging about them being members and how bad the CFR is they scrubbed the pages and created "campaign" pages for everyone in both parties that were running for president.

Excerpt:
Palin’s meeting with Kissinger, however, is apt to be of far greater significance than the others. As the New York Times observed in a September 22 report:

It is likely that Mr. Kissinger, a close outside adviser to Mr. McCain’s campaign, will give Ms. Palin a broad overview of international affairs, focusing particularly on Russia, China and the Middle East. Mr. Kissinger, who was national security adviser and secretary of state in the Nixon and Ford administrations, is regularly called on by Mr. McCain for advice on foreign affairs.

It could be said that for a foreign policy novice such as Sarah Palin, having a tutorial session with the great master of international affairs, Henry Kissinger, will be a unique learning experience. After all, Kissinger has been an adviser to presidents and is quite capable of bringing Palin up to speed in short order. Kissinger served as Secretary of State and National Security Adviser under presidents Nixon and Ford, was our nation’s chief negotiator at the Paris Peace Accords with the North Vietnamese during the Vietnam War, helped negotiate the giveaway of the Panama Canal, served as the Disney Corporation’s negotiator with the Chinese, and was involved in countless other globe-trotting missions involving foreign policy.

Since the relationship between Kissinger (a former Harvard professor) and Palin at the meeting will undoubtedly be one of mentor-to-protégé, we can reasonably expect that the mentor will indoctrinate his protégé on behalf of the interventionist foreign policy the U.S. government has followed for decades under both Republican and Democrat administrations.
http://www.thenewamerican.com/usnews/foreign-policy/370

“Oh what a wicked web we weave when first we practice to deceive.”
The Trinity at the center or close to the center of the web - Council on Foreign Relations (CFR), Trilateral Commission (TC), and Bilderberg (BB) Group

The quotes from above are only "a drop in the bucket" of quotes from either members, past members, or people in a position to know what's going on.

"A conspiracy is rarely, if ever, proved by positive testimony. When a crime of high magnitude is about to be perpetrated by a combination of individuals, they do not act openly, but covertly and secretly. The purpose formed is known only to those who enter into it. Unless one of the original conspirators betray his companions and give evidence against them, their guilt can be proved only by circumstantial evidence..."
~ Special Judge Advocate John A. Bingham, quoted in "The Trial Of The Conspirators", Washington, 1865

Circumstantial evidence is not less probative than direct evidence, and, in some instances, is even more reliable. United States v. Nelson, supra 419 F.2d at 1239.

"Those who suffer from conspiracy phobia are fond of saying: "Do you actually think there's a group of people sitting around in a room plotting things?" For some reason that image is assumed to be so patently absurd as to invite only disclaimers. But where else would people of power get together – on park benches or carousels? Indeed, they meet in rooms: corporate boardrooms, Pentagon command rooms, at the Bohemian Grove, in the choice dining rooms at the best restaurants, resorts, hotels, and estates, in the many conference rooms at the White House, the NSA, the CIA, or wherever. And, yes, they consciously plot – though they call it "planning" and "strategizing" – and they do so in great secrecy, often resisting all efforts at public disclosure. No one confabulates and plans more than political and corporate elites and their hired specialists."
~ Michael Parenti, "Dirty Truths", City Lights Books, 1996.

Parenti also has interesting things to say about the role of investigative commissions, and how they are often designed to reach a pre-ordained, desired conclusion.

If someone is "planning" something for our nation in a place only members can go and is only open for members to hear... where US officials and congressmen who are not members can't go and/or can't hear... then it is behind our congresses back and is called plotting and I have no doubt that the Founders of our Republic would call it TREASON.
PermalinkPermalink 07/16/09 @ 12:27

In response to: Obama Proposes a Leftist Democrat Police State

john brightman [Visitor] · http://www.whoismark.com
HI
looks very interesting!
bookmarked your blog.
john brightman
PermalinkPermalink 05/25/09 @ 11:24

In response to: Barack Obama and Hugo Chavez: Two of a kind?

john brightman [Visitor] · http://www.whoismark.com
HI
looks very interesting!
bookmarked your blog.
john brightman
PermalinkPermalink 05/25/09 @ 11:21

In response to: Colin Powell disappointing endorsement of Barack Obama

john brightman [Visitor] · http://www.whoismark.com
HI
looks very interesting!
bookmarked your blog.
john brightman
PermalinkPermalink 05/25/09 @ 11:19

In response to: What if John McCain was Barack Obama?

john brightman [Visitor] · http://www.whoismark.com
HI
looks very interesting!
bookmarked your blog.
john brightman
PermalinkPermalink 05/25/09 @ 11:12

In response to: Is war with Iran a real scenario? You bet!

john brightman [Visitor] · http://www.whoismark.com
HI
looks very interesting!
bookmarked your blog.
john brightman
PermalinkPermalink 05/25/09 @ 11:06

In response to: Is war with Iran a real scenario? You bet!

john brightman [Visitor] · http://www.whoismark.com
HI
looks very interesting!
bookmarked your blog.
john brightman
PermalinkPermalink 05/25/09 @ 11:05

In response to: Barack vs. Sarah and the experience factor

john brightman [Visitor] · http://www.whoismark.com
HI
looks very interesting!
bookmarked your blog.
john brightman
PermalinkPermalink 05/25/09 @ 11:01

In response to: Barack vs. Sarah and the experience factor

john brightman [Visitor] · http://www.whoismark.com
HI
looks very interesting!
bookmarked your blog.
john brightman
PermalinkPermalink 05/25/09 @ 10:51

In response to: The VP debate: No knock out but a clear win

john brightman [Visitor] · http://www.whoismark.com
HI
looks very interesting!
bookmarked your blog.
john brightman
PermalinkPermalink 05/25/09 @ 10:37