Read What I See

    For those that missed it and have not heard about it, there is a story that caught my attention in an article posted at WND under the title, Obama's 'Big Brother'.   At first I was somewhat skeptical with the thought that perhaps there was some distortion of the facts. After doing some research, I came to the conclusion that there is need for concern.

    The report is based on a speech that Barack Obama made in Colorado Springs on July 2^nd. There was at least one news cast video recording of the event. There is one available video that can be seen with the ABC logo. There is another video that can be found on You Tube. The speech is 27 minutes long. It can also be viewed by going to the WND link in the above paragraph.

     There is an omission in the transcripts that should be of concern. Someone should be answering questions as for the reason the transcripts of his speech and the contents of the video do not match. Those that are responsible for omitting an entire paragraph, forty words of his speech need to explain why it was omitted. Barack Obama himself should be taking the lead and explaining what he was trying to say in the omitted section. The fact that there was an omission in the transcript and the lack of response from the Obama campaign is a good indication of dubious intent to conceal his remarks.

    Excerpt from the transcript:

    …And we'll also grow our Foreign Service, open consulates that have been shuttered, and double the size of the Peace Corps by 2011 to renew our diplomacy.

    (The contents in the following paragraph, comes after 16 minutes into the speech as Obama emotionally raises his voice to the sheers of his audience. This is the paragraph that was omitted from the transcript).

    "We cannot continue to rely on our military in order to achieve the national security objectives we've set. We've got to have a civilian national security force that's just as powerful, just as strong, just as well-funded."

Follow up:

    And we'll use technology to connect people to service…

    The statement on the missing paragraph was the most energetic statement that he made in the entire speech with perhaps the greatest significance.  Yet, it appears as if someone saw it as compromising and decided to bury it.

    I cannot 100% verify the authenticity of the video although I listened to it and did an audio recording of the omitted section. If it turns out to be true, someone needs to do a lot of explaining. If the day comes when the News Media and the Obama camp have to explain what was said or what was meant to be said; or any other theoretical explanation of why it was omitted, questions will remain.

“We cannot continue to rely on our military” Wow! We have been relying on them for our National Security through many wars and have provided us the strength to maintain us secure. Words out of his mouth lead us to interpret that, our military is not good enough in an Obama administration.

“In order to achieve the national security objectives we’ve set” Wow! In order to achieve who’s objectives and who has set them. In his own words: Who is we? I don’t recall where there has ever being any discussion about a new National Security Objective.

    In reference to the military “just as powerful” Wow! A force that is powerful enough to maintain stability in the entire world. A force that powerful would be strong enough to strip us from the freedom that we have or anything we own; from our constitution to our land.

    In reference to the military “just as strong” Wow! With a force that strong after striping us from the second amendment it would not take much time to disarm our population. They could dismantle the militia that our founders put in place to challenge them.

    In reference to the military “just as well funded” Wow! In 2008 the Department of Defense budget is $518,000,000,000 ($518 billion dollars). With that kind of money going into it, in no time at all it could turn into the most powerful, the strongest and the best funded Policy State Society that has ever existed. It would dwarf Adolph Hitler, Joseph Stalin, Mao Zedong, Kim II-sung, Fidel Castro and Pol Pot all put together.

    The Obama campaign is riddled with controversy and all of the dubious figures that are influencing the promotion of this political career; specially the ones that we do not see. Barack Obama is so new and inexperienced that one has to wonder if there really is some hidden agenda from his Far Left Liberal promoters. He could have never gotten as far as he has if it wasn’t for the Liberal media that is campaigning for him and the unknowns.

    Among the unknowns is the ACLU (American Civil Liberties Union). The ACLU role in our society among other things is to defend and preserve the individual rights and liberties guaranteed to every person in this country by the Constitution and laws of the United States." We can ask Don Imus how much help the ACLU offered him when he was fired for exercising his Freedom of Speech. We can also see how much help they are offering the people of South Carolina while they are trying to defend Freedom of expression by displaying the Confederate flag which they rightfully claim as part of their heritage. As we can see the ACLU has no interest in protecting the civil liberties of all our citizens but only those who sympathize with their Leftist Liberal views. During this presidential election it would be very clear to see on what side of the political arena they are on. Based on that don’t count on the ACLU trying to protect us from a Socialist National Repressive Police.

    Another factor to consider is the amount of cash that has poured into Obama’s Presidential race. Based on the contributions that have already being placed on his support, by the time the Presidential election takes place, his cash contributions will have exceeded half billion dollars. Peculiar on his campaign is the continuing flip-flopping of positions and movement away from his Far Left Wing of the party. Make no illusions; it is on the Far Left that he belongs. After securing his nomination for the Democratic Party on a very leftist platform he has moved away from it as he looks for a constituency that was not his from the beginning. The more centrist Democrats were in Hillary’s pocket and now Obama and his leftist backers desperately are trying to figure out how to reach them in November.

    To the best of my knowledge Joseph Farah of WND was the originator in this inquires. Any concerned citizen in our society needs to get involved and find a truthful answer to the omission in Obama’s transcripts.

   A vote for Barack Obama in November 2008 could amount to a self-inflicted coup d’état

Vote Wisely in 2008