Is Barack Obama trustworthy?
By P Alfonso on Aug 9, 2008 | In 9. Presidential Election 2008
What makes Barack Obama qualified to be the President of the U.S.A.? Does anyone know? We hear speeches and empty rhetoric but that has nothing to do with experience and his vision for the future. He does an excellent job reading the TelePrompTer but cannot answer questions without continuous stuttering. He either suffers from a speech impediment or many times cannot say what he thinks for fear of damaging his ability to be elected. There is no doubt that he cannot answer some questions, which may be the reason why he will not do Town Hall meetings and has only agreed to three Presidential debates.
Obama appears to be a puppet of the far left wing of the Democratic Party. A wing so far to the left that had no interest in allowing Hillary Clinton, a true Liberal, as their candidate. There is no way that Obama could be in the position that he is today if it was not for his leftist promoters outside the Party. Undoubtedly, he is going to owe them for his nomination of the Democratic Party. With all of the information that is available, it does not take long to research who he is indebted to. Below are some of his staunch promoters outside the Democratic Party.
Follow up:
MoveOn.Org. It has raised millions of dollars for candidates of the Democratic Party in the United States. The ability to use 'hard money' – as opposed to grants and tax-deductible contributions – enables them to be partisan, contribute to political campaigns and exercise clout in the political process. MoveOn was criticized for running a print ad in The New York Times that questioned the personal integrity of General David Petraeus, saying “General Petraeus or General Betray Us?
George Soros. He said that he supports Barack Obama for the Democratic candidate in the 2008. Soros does not consider himself religious, and has stated that he does not believe in God. His enormous winnings are now devoted to encouraging transitional and emerging nations to become 'open societies,' open not only in the sense of freedom of commerce but - more important - tolerant of new ideas and different modes of thinking and behavior." He has funded various gun control organizations. , Investor's Business Daily criticized Soros for funding organizations such as MoveOn.org and has claimed that Soros is not transparent in the way he gives away his money. …Brock described that the plan intends to raise $40 million to run political advertisements against the presumptive Republican nominee, Senator John McCain, through a group called The Fund for America and Progressive Media, whose key backer, according to politico.com, is Soros.
The Huffington Post. The Huffington Post regularly publishes scoops of current news stories, otherwise providing links to selected prominent news stories, providing a left-of-center counterpoint to sites such as The Drudge Report. Compared to other left-wing blogs such as the expertise-heavy Znet or the long-established Daily Kos.
Daily Kos. A political blog, publishing news and opinion from a far-left point of view. It functions as a discussion forum and group blog for a variety of netroots activists, whose efforts are primarily directed toward influencing and strengthening the Democratic Party.
The intentions of those who are so intensely looking to elect Barack Obama are that of forcing upon us an Open Society Philosophy. It is very important to understand the significance of forcing upon us such philosophy. It is a radical change from the society in which we live in. The trend towards an Open Society has already started with the appointment of Liberal Judges in past Democratic administrations. Conservative Judges will preserve the values, morals and the concept that the majority rules. Obama and his supporters desperately need to tilt the balance of the Supreme Court towards the left. Tilting the balance would enable them to eventually change our Constitution for as it stands today; their goals cannot be achieved.
An Open Society would strip us of the traditional mores that we value and substitute them with a promiscuous society in which there are no boundaries for freedom. The members of a free society would have full dominion over their public and private lives. In an Open Society political freedom is the absence of interference with the sovereignty of an individual by the use of coercion or aggression. Let us say for example that if I were to feel uncomfortable wearing clothes because it was hot, then it is my given right to go about naked if I so desire and no law should be enacted to deprive me of my right. This may sound drastic but not really: Some cities already allow people to enter public bathrooms according to their gender preferences. I personally would not appreciate a male entering a bathroom where my wife and daughter are in, because he claims that today he feels feminine. That is one of the many surprises that we can expect of an Open Society. We see news coming from the city of San Francisco and see people walking naked on the streets with no repercussions; we are looking at an Open Society on the making. The city of San Francisco is the mold for the rest of our country under the gang of four: Barack Obama, Nancy Pelosi, Harry Reid and George Soros. The only thing standing between the present values of our nation and them is the Supreme Court.
These enterprises that are working hard to bring about drastic changes work outside the Democratic Party, but yet they have managed to give Obama the nomination. If they have this much influence on the Democratic Party, it would be fair to assume that they own it. Seeing that George Soros has his hands and his money in every entity that was crucial for Obama’s nomination: Would it be logical to assume that he is the one who has put him there? There are many research links that indicate that George Soros ambitions to change the world will start with us. Barack Obama also is a believer of introducing an Open Society. What does he exactly mean when he speaks of Change? If Barack Obama becomes our next President, his puppeteer would have in his hands the future of our country. For it appears that it is he, who has handpicked Barack Obama.
More proof of the power of the George Soro’s political machine is the defeat of Hillary Clinton, who at one point appeared to be unbeatable. The nomination of Barack Obama has been to the resentment of half of the registered Democrats who were avid Hillary supporters. Although these far left wing organizations only represent a minority in the Democratic Party, they have managed to silence and overwhelm the more centrist and conservative Democrats. These far left organizations could not own the Hillary Clinton political machine. Therefore, they promoted the newest and the least experienced Senator that was campaigning for the Democratic Party. They wanted someone that they could say to “you owe us”. During this process they manipulated and pulled towards Obama a large portion of Hillary black constituency. Pastor James D. Manning's opinion is that black Americans are making a mistake by voting for Barack Obama. A very large portion of black Americans are religious and an Open Society clashes with the basic fundamentals of religion.
Many of the Super Delegates that were supporting Hillary caved in under pressure and reversed position to support Barack Obama. Not all in the party have lost power to the far left wing or are silent. There is a move from disenchanted Hillary supporters that are refusing to go along with the new party owners. The Democrats that support PUMA (Party Unity My Ass) have continued resistance to the nomination of Barack Obama and will continue to threaten his nomination. It has become apparent that the two millions strong PUMA supporters in November most likely will support John McCain.
Harriet Christian
So far Barack Obama has not shown that he has a strong position on any issue. He has recently reversed his opinion in just about every major issue that he campaigned for against Hillary Clinton. There are two major issues of which he has not spoken of again. Therefore, we could conclude that there has been no position change on them. These issues are troubling statements that he has made in reference to our military and national security. The first troubling statement he makes on the video below.
This is are critical policy statement that should raise some eyebrows and be of concern to all of our citizens including many of his supporters. He basically is saying that he is going to end all wars by making us so ill equipped that we could not fight one. There would be no point in fighting if it were impossible to win. No wonder most of the world sees him as a liberator. He is going to have our country to capitulate to the rest of the world. We will not be a super power and will be subjected to the mercy of other super powers. Under an Obama administration, the most powerful country in the world will be no more. Our military might help us secure and maintain the life that we live. In an Obama presidency, we will become a third world country. I don’t say so, he does.
To add fuel to the fire, I will mention the article that I wrote (Obama proposes a Leftist Democrat Police State). You can find this article on my website list of contents. It is based on a forty words paragraph that was omitted on the transcripts of a speech that he made on July 2nd in Colorado Springs. This topic has been picked up by other bloggers and is now circulating on the net.
…And we'll also grow our Foreign Service, open consulates that have been shuttered, and double the size of the Peace Corps by 2011 to renew our diplomacy.
"We cannot continue to rely only on our military in order to achieve the national security objectives we've set. We've got to have a civilian national security force that's just as powerful, just as strong, just as well-funded."
This assumption could be wrong but, if he intends to have a civilian security force the size of our military, he may be anticipating that the military will oppose the changes that they are planning to make. Very conveniently, as we see on the first video, he will cut the funds for the military to weaken it. Then, they will spend billions of dollars in a force that will be stronger than the military and will support the changes that they anticipate making.
Anyone that does not share the opinion that an Obama administration would bring drastic changes to our Freedom, needs to research the history of the Russian Revolution and Castro’s Cuba. The radical changes that occurred in these two countries were inspired by the theories of Karl Marx. It took the people of Russia seven decades of suffering to rid their country of an experiment that failed. The Dictatorship of Fidel Castro imposed the same experiment on the Cuban people and after fifty years of Marxism they are still suffering from a philosophy that has already been discredited.
We expect from an Obama administration another experiment similar to what Karl Marx offered. They intent to conduct on our society and experiment based on the philosophy of Karl Popper. Just what we needed; another Karl to fantasize a philosophy and some loonies in our society that would like to experiment with us. One of the primary doctrines that our Democracy has offered us, is the concept that the majority rules. Followers of Popper’s philosophy believe that a minority can impose itself on the majority. On top of the list of controversial subjects that we are confronting today is the acceptance of same sex marriages versus moral and religious believes. Under a Karl Popper’s philosophy, the minority can force their wishes on the majority and it must be accepted because that will be the law of the land. These examples are just the tip of the iceberg in reference to the drastic changes that an Open Society Philosophy would impose on our society. One of the most vivid followers of Karl Popper’s philosophy is none other than George Soros; the man behind the man.
The far left wing of the Democratic Party and his promoters have a sinister agenda that would destroy our way of life, if permitted.
There is an optimistic way to look at all of this:
On the first Wednesday of November 2008, we the citizens of the United States of America will wake up with the good news that Barack Hussein Obama and his Socialist Open Society promoters will have crawled back in the whole that they came out of. Democracy and the will of free people will have defeated their Open Society dreams which they had intended to force upon us with a repressive socialist agenda.
Vote Wisely in 2008

| « Choosing a President in 2008 is a no brainer! | Obama’s naive strategy of tapping the Strategic Oil Reserve. » |




















