Whose side are they on is the question. In arriving at this one must first look at the main reason they interfere in Middle East affairs. Western Bankers have rule the world for some time and this is the front where the war against them has been fought. Get a real education and watch this video "All wars are banker's wars." "If my sons did not want wars, there would be none." Gutle Schnaper Rothschild
Ironically the US interfered in the Middle East with the banner of removing ruthless dictators. We cannot ignore the fact that the US has a lengthy history of installing a supporting dictators. Saudi Arabia for instance is ruled by a ruthless monarchy, yet we have been best friends since the Petro Dollar was established as the tool in the sale and purchase of oil. So evidently this rhetoric of removing dictators for the sake of the people is false. As American citizens we must recognize that when we speak of US actions they are not the rational actions of the American people but the Bankers marching orders.
The propaganda of removing the ruthless dictators of Iraq, Libya, Syria and the Theocracy of Iran was due because they shared rebellious governments which did not accept the Rothschild founded Central Bank; we can add North Korea to the list and Cuba to certain extent. Understanding this we can see where the propaganda label of "Axis of Evil" arises from. In addition Iraq, Libya and Iran refused to accept Dollars as payment for their oil thus disrupting the Petro Dollar system which favors the US Dollar on the side of the Bankers. We need to understand that the world's dominating US Dollar is not the American people Dollar, it is in reality the Central Bankers Dollar. The Dollar is controlled by the Central Bankers via the Federal Reserve founded by international bankers. The US government or the politicians that we elect have no control over the Federal Reserve. Libya went even a step further when Muammar Gaddafi introduced the Gold African Dinar. He crossed the line and sealed his fate when he tried to replace Central Bankers paper fiat fraud money with real money by turning to Gold. But you see, most Americans do not know any of this because little they know that does not come from the brainwash, propaganda, indoctrination, deceit and lies that is spewed by the American media and television which they tune in day after day night after night. Little most Americans now that does not come out of a television screen dominated by the Central Bankers. Television as correctly describe in the 1976 movie "Network" as not being the truth (watch a short clip here).
Very few Americans know that our people and nation serve these bankers. They have given us the Dollar the world must use but in return we have given them a military force to subdue the rest of the world to their wishes. Americans have also provided them with our young who to this day still continue to spill their blood in assisting them to rule the world by force while depriving others of their sovereignty. Yet, most Americans foolishly believe that they do so in order spread freedom and to protect ours when in reality they are supporting a system that has denied us and others of sovereignty. There is no national freedom without sovereignty.
The international Central Bankers that blackmail our nation and we serve on our knees are being challenged by Russia, China and the other BRICS nations. They are fed up with bullying by the Central Bankers via the US and have rebelled. These Bankers had in the past few decades set up a system for payment for international trade which gave them a monopoly. This would be equivalent to an individual person rebelling against our oppressive system of laws and taxation and be cut out of the banking system where we would not have access to banking, deposits, cashing a payroll check, making payment to mortgage or possessing cash to buy food and so on. This they did to Iran three years ago for not complying. They cut them off the SWIFT system but Americans tuning in to television were foolishly persuaded to believe that it was because they were a nuclear threat to the world. This SWIFT retaliation now ended with the P5+1 nuclear deal which was a lot more than just a nuclear deal.
So it is a no brainer to see that SWIFT is a dictatorial International Payment System which all nations must use for payment in international trade. Much is written on it but this article explains it in brief. Brazil, India, China, Russia and South Africa (BRICS nations) have been trying to replace the SWIFT monopoly slave system of the western Centrals Bankers. The Bankers tried to cut Russia from the SWIFT system when they annexed Crimea but other than inposing some sanctions they were incapable of choking them.
Russia and the other BRICS have already started their own international payment settlement system and this has given Russia the freedom to act at will and aid its long Middle East allied Syria. There is a war for sovereignty against the Western Central Bankers that we have served since the founding of the Federal Reserve in 1916. The world is changing at a very fast pace and our nation will go thru a drastic and radical change when the Dollar is abandoned by the rest of the world. Within the disaster perhaps this will give us our lost sovereignty back. As they say, it is true that freedom isn't free.
Bonus comment: Also understand that fools are born every day, and today's Israel was not founded by God, it was founded by the Rothschild Bankers or Money Changers (read it here). These Money Changers have been playing God for thousands of years and they will worship none but Gog and Magog as they always have.
Confronted with the growing problems of inequality, poverty and hunger some leaders of the world apparently scrapped the depopulation agenda sought by others thru war and chaos and have opted to appease humanity. This evidently still has opposition from the greedy few who want it all and have not fully capitulated yet. Not limited to, read about it here, here, here and here. On the other hand common sense tells those who are less brutal that without compromises they risk losing it all.
The Pope is not alone in this endeavor and is representative of other world elites; make no mistake and buy into the compassion smoke screen. They are mostly motivated by the desire of continued influence and control of humanity. The Catholic 1.2 billion followers and the rest of Christianity which closely follows them are the main target. It is about power as it always has been and they are willing to adapt in order to survive. Did not Emperor Constantine a never convert to the faith took over the faith in order to control the followers? Still fresh in the ruling class memory is the French Revolution which was ignited by hunger. Their goal is to prevent something similar.
"Certainly, all of the following must be counted among the causes of the revolution:
- Resentment of royal absolutism.
- Resentment of the seigneurial system by peasants, wage-earners, and a rising bourgeoisie.
- The rise of enlightenment ideals.
- An unmanageable national debt, both caused by and exacerbating the burden of a grossly inequitable system of taxation.
- Food scarcity in the years immediately before the revolution."
We are presently on stage 5 of the above they are trying to prevent stage 6 which most certainly will follow if not thwarted.
The 20th Century is riddle with brutality, human suffering and depopulation (read about it and the numbers here). Too numerous to bother adding up but it is pretty close to 1 billion. WWII alone was 76 million. Just within a few seconds with the nuking of Japan over 200,000 were wiped out. It is incomprehensible to picture the stack of human corpses. Even more were intended for the 21st Century but apparently some elites decided to take a different course. I did the math on it and at 8 inches in depth the corpses of the 20th Century would stack up half way between Earth and the Moon. A culpability that rest on the hand of those ruling humanity.
Humanity is incapable to rule itself but it can certainly motivated by hunger threaten the existence of the few who do. Perhaps to a lesser extent in our benefit, but be certain that the policy they appear to have adopted is first and foremost for their benefit. We may benefit from it but as usual they will just throw the crumbs to keep us contained. The world's economy is in a crashing mode, they are just trying to mitigate its effect on humanity in order to restrain its response. Bluntly put; they are trying to save their asses.
In summary; in spite of their real motives this policy at least for now appears to be humanity's best option. Unfortunately for those who were looking forward to total destruction in order to accelerate their revered "End of Times" the Pope may have turned out to be a real party pooper.
We have two policies: One outdated that the Neo-Cons and some world leaders are still trying to adhere to, and a new policy that the world has embarked on.
Make no mistake, the Pope is among the rulers of the world; he and others are trying to secure their position. Throughout history there have been Monarchies that accommodated the peasants, relieved and satisfy their demands and needs and they survive. On the other hand there have been others who thought they could imprison, torture, kill, ignore hunger and govern them by the sword; eventually they failed.
That is basically what is transforming the way most world rulers are dealing with humanity today. They are not looking to set them free, they are just putting down their sword trying to get their willing cooperation. There are those accusing the Pope and elites on his side of socialism or communism and they need to wake up to a reality. For Capitalism to survive there has to exist a very large Middle Class supporting it. This class has shrunk and will even more so when the nations of the world go thru bankruptcy and the destruction of paper money. The nations of the world are carrying a debt which they cannot honor and paper money has been printed by the trillions; they are bankrupted and the economies just hanging by a thread. When most of humanity is jobless, poor and hungry which system will they need?
Look at it from the proper perspective; they have to get humanity to join in or dispose of them. Most do not know this because live in the small world the elite creates but War or a disaster and depopulation was in their agenda. They had planned to reduce world population by billions and it is documented for anyone that has done the research. There is this and many other sources.
The Pentagon used to be controlled by the Neo-Cons who ruled most of the world by the sword but purged them during the past three years and are enforcing the new policy. Remember when recently they dismissed, fired and retired hundreds of them? It was about the Brzezinski policy, read about it here.
World rulers know the future because they create it and peasants can hardly see beyond the next meal. Look into the not too distant future and reality to decide which policy you would prefer if you woke up tomorrow jobless and broke?
The below link is not a new article but a must read. It is short, and by using your imagination and common sense it explains where we are today in politics and where we are heading.
Gradually during the past five decades the Neo-Cons and the Zionists had grown into the force that eventually dominated US foreign and domestic policy. They overreached when decided to pull the 9/11 false flag and sent the nation in a self-destruct and bankrupt path in order to satisfy the wishes of foreign and domestic Zionists which were supported by Neo-Cons. Growing public awareness of this has caused much of the public to lose faith in government, public elected and non-elected official and their policies. Half of the Israeli population did not want this path either but were overpowered by the radical Zionists who have put Israel in a path of self-destruction along with our nation.
In the below short video listen to Brzezinski speak of a global awakening and the need for a new approach (2:50 minute mark).
Brzezinski is strongly against the bullying of the Israeli Zionists trying to push their selfish and destructive global policy.
"Zbigniew Brzezinski suggests that Barack Obama do more than just refuse to support an Israeli strike on Iran's nuclear sites -- the American president must give the order to shoot down Israeli aircraft as they cross Iraqi airspace:"
There has been a reversal and a new policy and path implemented which is why we see a change towards war, Iran, Syria and the Zionist controlled Israeli government. Brzezinski does not have the power himself but his expertise in geopolitics and advice serves as the powerbase for the few who control and enforce policy thus making it his policy. The change from previous policy has been a process and took nearly the entire Obama's first term to unwind the previous power source. During Obama's second term power has clearly shifted and the new policy solidified. Policy is not a president's thing, which is why John F. Kennedy was assassinated when he naively thought though that he could create his own. Those who so passionately think that these characters seeking the presidency and your vote will be policy makers perhaps you need to wake up to the reality that they are not. Our elected officials entertain the people with trivia, nevertheless as recognized by Brzezinski a conscious awakened humanity not brainwashed by propaganda is feared by the few who rule our world.
Zbigniew Brzezinski has been a major player since the Jimmy Carter administration and has redirected policy with the election of Barack Obama as his handpicked president. We should without question conclude that he also did his Vice President. Joe Biden likely will enter the race and become the uncontested candidate of the Democratic Party. Hillary fans will be left out in the cold. Biden as a Catholic will have the blessing of Pope Francis and Catholics. Also we should notice that Pope Francis has become a major player in current policy as he prepares to meet with Obama, speak to Congress and address the UN after arriving next week from Cuba; the US new friend.
In election 2016 there will be opposition from pro-Zionist Evangelicals, Zionists, Neo-Cons and even some old Cuban refugees that influence the South Florida vote. Most young people will be the swing vote against the GOP outdated policy and certainly will be joined by Atheist whose main interest will be to vote against Evangelicals. Regardless, current policy will go forward which is what makes it unlikely that anyone other than the man controlled by such will get elected.
There are many changes coming and hard times ahead for all. We are a deep in debt bankrupted nation that has enjoyed having the world's currency status. We have printed as needed the paper money that the entire world was forced to use and that is coming to an end in the not too distant future. Our world is going to drastically change and many will suffer when we lose our present world status. At this point the best that we can hope for is a policy of "compassion" because we are all going to need it and those who were enforcing the previous policy do not know what the word means.
As I summarized in my previous article there will be debates, entertainment, irrelevant public involvement and emotions but at the end this appears to be an already done deal.
Get better acquainted bonus link.
The GOP has been capturing the 2016 presidential headlines mostly by the eccentric behavior of Donald Trump and another dozen or so not so entertaining wannabees. These prospects are lining up to continue a policy that has been discontinued. On the Democratic side things have been much quitter. Hillary Clinton has appeared to be the dominant contestant but the Clinton and Bush dynasties are over. Bernie Sanders has been rattling his audience, and the rest, not much is heard from. Other than for their old faithful ideologues Bush and Clinton will be ignored by the rest, especially the younger voters.
If we understand the true nature of the President we should see the limited power given to a single individual who possesses limited knowledge and experience in domestic, financial and foreign affairs. Recently we saw where Donald Trump did not know the difference between Hezbollah and Hamas. Policy is directed by a group of organizations and individuals who working together formulate future planning and a paths of action. The policy of the past few decades has been disastrous by protecting and serving only the interest of a few guided by greed and selfishness not only ignoring the best interest of the US population but humanity in general. The result of this has now come to pass with the decimation of most of the middle class, poverty on the rise and government dependency becoming the norm.
Debt is edging our nation and world's towards bankruptcy and default and humanity is standing at the edge of a cliff. All that would take for our world to come crashing down is for the dollar to loss world's status or another banking industry failure as the one experienced in 2008. The financial failure of 2008 was temporarily patched up with the injection of unknown trillions of dollars but most experts agree that such option does not exist the next time around.
The president does not formulate policy, he supports it, tries selling it to the people and puts his signature on it to officially validate it. We recently saw this taking place with P5+1 Join Plan of Action (JPOA) better known as the Iran Nuclear Deal. This was as much of an Obama deal as it was the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act. Likely less than 5% of the US population could name either of them by the real names. Ironically JPOA and ACA were not Obama deals or his written laws but policies formulated for him to approve, promote and make official with his signature. In fact both of these laws were not even written by our Congress who according to the US Constitution are the ones with the authority to write our laws. The Affordable Care Act law was written long before Barack Obama was elected and Congress was voting on it without even reading it. The name of Obamacare was given to it by opponents who had no clue of why they were opposing it.
Contemplating the 2016 presidential election we have two views. The largest come from the crowd following the show as offered by television and have not doubt, it is a show. The other is the smaller group who follows the policy battle. Basically on the later there are two factions. On one side is the discontinued NeoCon-Zionist dying policy of PNAC which gave us the New American Century and the New Pearl Harbor which was the 9/11 false flag. On the other side we have the Zbigniew Brzezinski policy which backed up Obama's presidency run in 2008 and approves of the P5+1 Iran nuclear deal. To understand how strong the Brzezinski policy is all we have to do is notice that not only the United Kingdom, France, Russia, China and Germany are on board but so is Pope Francis. He is going to debut in Congress on September 24th and will speak on the 25th at the United Nations to officially stamp it with his blessing. No matter what he will speak of his appearance will be a symbolic approval. No doubt climate change will be a subject that will clash with the deniers.
In summary there will be one candidates from each Party elected at the primaries. No matter who it is on the GOP, it will offer the candidate of the discontinued policy and the Democrats the one who will continue the current path. I will put my money on the Democrats. The question remains on who the Democratic choice will be. If we watch closely we notice that Joe Biden is easing his way in and testing the waters while not wanting to enter too early and wear out support. If he were to enter the race it is unlikely that the Party would support anyone other than the sitting Vice President. Let it be of no doubt that if it happens will be with the condition of continuing the Zbigniew Brzezinski policy. Those who understand policy will vote for policy, and I personally, although foolishly due to ignorance did in the past will definitely not vote for the policy of war, genocide and destruction that the NeoCon and Zionist had us on. Realistically there are no Mr. Nice Guys and Brzezinski works to protect the interest of whoever it is he works for. At this point humanity is better served if they support a policy which does not include war, depopulation and famine and current policy appears not to pursue such, where the previous policy did.
This change in policy is a major shift and world event confirmed by actions in the Vatican with the removal a sitting Pope. Popes just don't resign.
Here are two prime examples of religious mandates which were not God's mandates at all but man issued restrictions conforming to the needs of the times such as hygiene and health. The below man would have not followed unless he believed that they were God given orders.
Circumcision John 7:22: "Yet, because Moses gave you circumcision (though actually it did not come from Moses, but from the patriarchs)."
Pork eating restrictions Quran 2:173: "He has forbidden you only dead animals, and blood, and the swine, and that which is slaughtered as a sacrifice for other than God."
If the above were God's given orders then obviously not many listened to his wishes with 80% of the world's population not circumcised and a planet full of bacon loving people. Yet, incomprehensibly some still follow it.
There should be no doubt that previous push against contraception by the Catholic Church was in order to have more children brought into the faith. Ironically after so many Catholic women having so many children due to their faith the Catholic Church reversed its status conforming to the times.
"Then, in 1966, Paul VI's birth control commission presented its preliminary report to the pope. It held big news: The body had overwhelmingly voted to recommend lifting the prohibition on contraceptives. (The former Archbishop of Brussels, Cardinal Leo Suenens, went so far as to say the church needed to confront reality and avoid another "Galileo case.")"
The above was not a monopoly of the Catholic Church as the Protestant religion also promoted it.
"In constructing his evangelical family ethic, Luther placed emphasis on Genesis 1:28: "Be fruitful and multiply." This was more than a command; he called it "a divine ordinance [werck] which it is not our prerogative to hinder or ignore."
How Protestants Learned to Love the Pill
Now the church is loosening restrictions on abortion and homosexuality.
"Pope Francis will allow Roman Catholic priests to absolve women who have had abortions if they seek forgiveness during the upcoming Holy Year of Mercy"
"When I meet a gay person, I have to distinguish between their being gay and being part of a lobby. If they accept the Lord and have goodwill, who am I to judge them? They shouldn't be marginalized. The tendency [to homosexuality] is not the problem.they're our brothers."
The Ten Commandments are a logical direct rule said to be commanded by God in order for our species to coexist and survive but bible passages are only implied to be the world of God. Messengers deliver passages on the bible. These were men given which reflected the personal views of the writer in reference to the customs, needs and beliefs of the times re-interpreted today by people who live in an entire different era.
Throughout history interpretation of such written rules have constantly change within religion in order to adapt to the times. Nothing gives us a better example than Jesus message of love and peace and the acceptance of wars for greed, dominance and the injustices committed and supported by those claiming to be his followers.
The rules of religion are not the rules of God. In fact we don't know what such rules are other than what we humans within our own structure given by our creator feel as just and fair without been dictated by contriving and dominating politicians and religious leaders. Our world is quickly changing as we see with the Catholic Church acceptance of homosexuality and abortion. Until recently the church and religion saw both of these issues as moral taboos because they interfere with growth of a population which was needed to support and increase the faithful rosters and the man power to support wars. Now this has changed and as population growth and limited planet resources have become a greater menace. Protestants will not be left far behind and soon will be fed the same rhetoric by their religious leaders. The means which contrive human reproduction such as homosexuality and abortion are no longer seen by a changing world as taboos in morality.
We should clearly see there are no God mandates in religion and the leaders are just herd handlers that steer the faithful in whichever direction they see necessary and accommodates beliefs and morality to fit their policies.
Be blessed with the absence of religious or political ideologies as a passage to the freedom given by our creator and taken away by those who falsely pretend to represent such.
Ideology is neither freedom nor truth.
Ideology: The body of ideas reflecting the social needs and aspirations of an individual, a group, a class, or a culture. A set of doctrines or beliefs that form the basis of a political, economic, or other system.
Freedom: The condition of being free of restraints.
Truth: Reality, actuality.
New polls show that as of Friday August 21st, 51 percent of people in the US admit to disapprove of how Obama is handling the presidency while 47 approve. By a narrow 52 percent the majority of Americans also disapprove of his handling of the economy and foreign affairs. You can read more about it here. Ironically on what would be a different choice the GOP fairs even worse. The poll also shows that policies proposed by Republicans in Congress are opposed by 55 percent and only have a 39 percent approval. When it comes to being viewed unfavorably by the American people the Republican Party beats Obama as they have a 54 percent negative view and only 39 percent think that they would take the nation in the right direction.
Zbigniew Brzezinski who most Americans have never heard off and much less would be able to spell his full name has been involved in US policy since the Carter presidency. He helped Obama get elected over Hillary Clinton in 2008 and helped defeat NeoCon John McCain who I foolishly voted for because of my now defunct political ideology. The summary of this is that Barack Obama is just the man the majority of US citizens elected as the representative of a policy he did not create nor have the ability to enforce without the support of powerful forces. Most of his support comes from the Pentagon as they have adopted the Brzezinski policy. This policy has prevented Israel from attacking Iran triggering WWIII otherwise they would have already done so. Simply put, the vast majority of Americans do not know what the policy is, where it comes from and who is enforcing it. Not to go unoticed is that Pope Francis is supportive of the current policy. His meeting with Obama, speech to Congress and appearance at the UN next month is indicative of such.
It took nearly the entire first term of the Obama presidency to get a grip on a new policy away from the one Neo-Cons and Zionists have given us. They, under the label of A New American Century created the New Pearl Harbor better known as the false flag attack of 9/11. This policy is clearly stated by General Wesley Clark here as a "policy coup" and you can watch it here. The big shift in policy got a foot hold when Chuck Hagel was assigned as Secretary of Defense. Subsequently the removal of hundreds of NeoCons officers at the Pentagon followed. At the same time Hillary who is a Democratic NeoCon was replaced as Secretary of State by John Kerry. In a nutshell the loss of power by the NeoCons and Zionists summarizes the current foreign policy. As a result a new war has so far being adverted and the P5+1 deal now approved by the United Nations is in effect in spite of opposition from the Zionists and the NeoCon Congressmen and Senators in their pockets.
On the economic front things have not improved and it was never meant to. The recovery talk was just talk as for all practical purposes the world's economy collapsed in 2008. The creation of trillions of Dollars, Euros, Yen, Yuan, and Rubbles and so on kept it alive for another 7 year financial cycle. But here we are seven years later the can hit the wall and it is all quickly falling apart. If truly reported, unemployment in the US would be around 20% and GDP would be negative. We just noticed the inflated by Fed money stock market beginning a crash heading for an unknown bottom. Since 2001, if it had not been for the expansion of credit and a US debt that raised from $5 trillion to $18.4 trillion currently, our government would have long ago defaulted.
In summary and in behalf of the Brzezinski policy, hard times have arrived but if we can travel thru it without a major war including civil war humanity will see less pain and loss of lives.
Zbigniew Brzezinski who picked Obama over Hillary in 2008 will likely pick the next Democrat to run for president. It will possibly be Al Gore or Joe Biden. It will be someone who will continue the current policy, which is now officially the policy of the Pentagon and the Vatican and the policy that Brzezinski represents. The Pope is coming on September 23rd, 24th and 25th to meet with Obama, speak to Congress and address the UN. The Pope is after all the head of the Roman Empire residing at the Vatican that morphed into a religion with over two billion followers. Pope Francis will be the first ever Pope to address the US Congress. From where I stand; Netanyahu eat your heart out; you are history and the Pope is in.
We can forget about a president Donald Trump who is not really a Republican and is actually helping destroy the base of the Neo-Cons and Zionists influence in our political system. It is very unlikely that the GOP will be able to elect as president a Neo-Con faithful to the Zionists such as: Marco Rubio, Ted Cruz, Lindsey Graham and so on. The GOP can no longer elect a Neo-Con, but Zionists at the present still have too much influence in it to change its course. If they don't soon a third viable party will emerge. Not to be ignored is the fact that they are still adhering to a policy that deviates from the one Pope Francis is advocating.
On the Democratic side there will be no Bernie Sanders. The last thing that America needs is a Zionist president. It would be like letting the fox into the coop. Hillary does not stand a chance. She is only a media hype and who was first elected as a Senator in New York by Zionists. How else does an Arkansas woman go to New York City and get elected? There is even the possibility that under distress and chaos if the economy implodes before the 2016 election that Congress would approve an Obama third term.
Al Gore has been much ridiculed by his Global Warming theory, but guess what? The Pope now backs it up under the label of "climate change". And if the Pope backs it up then it officially becomes real. So watch out for a possible Al Gore comeback. I foolishly and naively voted for George W. Bush twice and can't help but to wonder if under a different policy if had Al Gore been elected we would have had the September 11th false flag and all of the wars that ensued.
A Secretary of State in Cuba today is a very symbolic show of US foreign policy change. John Kerry is in Cuba today at the rising of the US flag ceremony. It is only me who finds ironic that the US reopen relations with Cuba just prior to the Pope's visit to the island. The Pope will be arriving in the US on September 22nd coming from Cuba. Here is a quote from Raul Castro and his view on Pope Francis. "As I've already told my council of advisers, I read all of the Pope's speeches," he said. "If the Pope continues to speak like this, sooner or later I will start praying again and I will return to the Catholic Church - and I'm not saying this jokingly." "I promise that I will go to all of his Masses - and with satisfaction. I left the meeting this morning impressed, very impressed by his knowledge, his wisdom, modesty, and by all the virtues that we know he has," Castro said.
Of course there are other examples and variables that could take place in election 2016 but all of the above mentioned are very real and those still striving to retain the outdated policies are in a path of futility. Our world is in a radical path of change.
Here is likely the biggest reason for the $15 minimum wage talk, which is peanuts compared to the problems that lie ahead. All of the below is well documented for those who may question it, just do the research.
China has become the biggest economy in the world surpassing that of the US.
China has plenty of leverage to bring this change as the US owes them $1.3 trillion.
China has accumulated a massive and undisclosed amount of gold to back its currency.
China's Yuan (Reminbi) will likely be added this fall by the IMF as a world currency.
This would bring a major global dump of US dollars that would cause it to lose much of its value.
The cost of imports would sharply rise and cause major inflation in the US.
Inflation will cause a rise on the poverty level demanding more financial aid by the government in order to prevent famine, protests, riots and chaos.
Unable to fill that gap with taxation government will fill that gap with the purchasing price of goods and services (more inflation) by rasing the minimum wage.
The private sector faced with the increased payroll cost will be forced to raise prices.
The consumer will be taxed at the cash register and all will pay.
This increase in wages will not improve the lives of American but merely keep it from deteriorating further.
Preparations and contingency plans for these events have been long in the making.
It will not be the end of our world but it will change for the worse.
Many events are planned for the last quarter of 2015.
The Pope is coming to meet Obama, speak to Congress and at the UN on September 23rd, 24th and 25th and this was planned nearly a year ago.
Whatever happens will carry on to 2016 and beyond.
The ignorant will blame Obama and other helpless governing officials; however this is something that inevitably had to happen and has been long overdue.
Based on the amount of the proposed wage increase which is double the current, we can guess that government anticipates the dollar to lose at least half of its present value.
Is the above for certain? Perhaps not or not exactly but we will not have to wait long to find out.
China is already advertising it on this billboard at Bangkok airport.
It does look like it is Germany wanting out of the Euro and the EU and is using the Greece situation as the pretext to do it, and it is hard to criticize them for doing so if that is the case.
Greece's creditors of course want a deal so that they can get paid but Germany already milked the EU by being the strongest nation on it. They may see no point and no gain in the continue subsidizing of the European Union members.
One, two, three years down the road Italy, Spain, Portugal and France will face the same problem as Greece. Germany may grasp this juncture now to get out of the EU and the Euro. They may see the Greece crises as the golden opportunity. Germany looking into the future may see itself closely allied with the nations of Northern Europe (Austria, Sweden, Norway, Finland, Denmark, Netherlands, Switzerland, Belgium plus eastward to Russia and China. Apparently it is hard to ignore the fact they can rightfully see Greece, Italy, Spain, Portugal and France as liability dead beats.
Germany is also divorcing the US at it faces the same problem with an increasing dependency on credit that cannot be sustained for much longer and a debt that can never be repaid. Contagion from a collapse of the European Union and the Euro would quickly spread to our shores. We can see the fracture between Germany and the US in the below.
What is unfolding in front of the eyes of those who can see is apparently the disintegration of the world that was forged at the end of WWII and culminated with the fall or the Soviet Union and the unification of Germany. The Empire may not entirely fall and will morph as it usually does. Most of its pillars are crumbling with dissent. Not only financially and militarily pillars are crumbling but so is the religious.
If one thinks of Jesus as what he represented we can see a different picture from that we are taught by religion.
Jesus was not a religion nor he said to be; it was enlightenment with a message of love, harmony and peace. John 14:6 "Jesus saith unto him, I am the way, the truth, and the life". He exposed the corruption of the Pharisees and unsettled the Roman Empire which ultimately saw the need to overcome it when Emperor Constantine forcibly took over the movement. Jesus brought a Conscious Awakening and this was of so much importance that it signaled the beginning of a New Era (Pisces) and reset the calendar to the year 0000.
Unfortunately for humanity Roman Emperor Flavius Valerius Aurelius Constantinus Augustus took over the movement in the second century AD. This quenched the Conscious Awakening and sent humanity back into darkness for the next 1,800 years. We saw the Crusades, the Inquisition and continuous wars, oppression, poverty and taught ignorance. It would be hard to argue that the Age of Religions was not the Age of Darkness and ignorance. This becomes evident by just looking at the concept that people were put to death for not thinking that Earth was the center of the universe or that by giving money to the church one could buy a ticket to heaven. It is beyond comprehension that those who subscribed to the teachings of Jesus supported and participated in wars that were totally against his teachings. "Nothing is more welcome to a military empire than a religious doctrine that counsels obedience and acquiescence."
Constantine Christianity: "Constantine's desire to impose upon the Empire a religion that would identify obsequiousness to the deity with loyalty to the emperor found its perfect partner in Christianity - or at least in the Christianity he was to patronize. In the century before the ignoble alliance of one particular faction with the imperium many christianities had contended. Before Constantine, Christ had, for most Christians, been the 'good shepherd', just like Mithras and Apollo, not a celestial monarch or an imperial judge. Nor did the Christian sects dwell on the crucifixion scene."
"Constantine made his Roman Christian church hostage to the state so that now it would serve the needs of emperor and empire."
We recently can see the Catholic Church that Constantine founded change its tune:
We saw the unthinkable removal of a living Pope.
After centuries of promoting birth to fill their ranks and coffers the new motto is "Catholics don't need to breed like rabbits."
The latest from the richest organization in the world; "the rich should not rule the world".
So what is happening here; is the church changing or is it humanity's Conscious Awakening forcing the Church to change?
Pisces is ending and we are entering the Age of Aquarius which is believed to be the age of peace and harmony. The worse may not be over yet but if Jesus was a Conscious Awakening movement then those who believe in his return should be trilled because although perhaps not in the way they were taught by Constantine's Church it would be, it is happening.
In many ways the officially declared incapability of paying the existing debt of Greece and Puerto Rico compared to that of Italy, Spain and ours in the US only differentiate on the suffering level of austerity imposed on the population. In Greece the level of suffering by the population is pushing them to the point in which they are willing to accept the consequences of default in order to have a fresh start. They are now where we eventually will be given the proper amount of time. They are split on a NO or YES vote. This translates into those who are suffering and those who are not suffering enough yet.
Many rave about the dire consequences if Greece defaults. Of course those who are owed money will paint a picture of horror and suffering, but is it true? In 2008 Iceland decided to reject austerity and defaulted. Yes they had some problems but have since rebounded and jailed some of the bankers that bankrupted the nation. Read about their recovery here.
It is all about maintaining faith in a system that is already broken. Same as in the US, Greece has accumulated an unpayable debt. Greece will never be able to collect enough revenue from its citizens to pay it back and debt will continue to pile up. Payments come due for which they do not have enough revenue. The only way they can service that debt is by borrowing more and this is with interest rates at 0%. There is no way that interest rates can be raised again on this amount of world debt. Considering this, take the Fed talks of interest rate increase as the BS that it is.
This is what Greece's dilemma amounts to: You have a credit card with a balance of X dollars. When the monthly payment is due you have not made enough money to make the payment at which point you need the credit card company to lend you the money to make the payment. The credit company does not want you to default and have to declare a loss that will make them insolvent. In order to avoid declaring insolvency they agree on lending you the money. As a condition for lending the extra money austerity kicks in and they want you to cut back on your food bill in order to hopefully diminish the outstanding debt. Humanity withstands a lot of abuse but hungers changes the ball game. Is anyone naive enough to actually believe that the US offers Food Stamps to 46,000,000 Americans out of compassion and not to keep them off the streets rioting?
Paying of existing sovereign debt or debt accumulated by governments is something that cannot be done and the entire planet is going to negate payment. Visit this link and see a graphic view of the largest nations in the world debt stacked up in $100 dollar bills. None of them have the ability to pay what they owe or what they have promised their citizens in the form of pensions and medical services. They can continue to create paper money for some time to sustain payments but it is a historical fact that when that is done the value of the paper is diminished to a point where it becomes worthless. When reaching that point creditors and the people will be paid with paper money that does not buy a thing, gold and silver become the only currency of value and a new paper cycle begins. Read about paper money (fiat) here.
The US Dollar vs, the world is briefly explained here and what is unfair the world will seek to end.
The planet has been using the Dollar as the basis for monetary exchange. This is a currency that has lost 92% of its value in past 100 years. The only ones benefiting from this have been the US by being the only one able of printing it, our citizens and those who have profited from all of the wars financed with dollars. Since 2001 printing and debasement has accelerated and although the Dollar is still accepted by nations, the world is desperately working on a replacement.
It would be naive to think that with the stroke of a pen the people who work for corporations suddenly are going to change sides and decide to work for the people. This is not what is going to happen and these people will not get paid overtime because companies do not want to pay overtime and when they are forced to pay them for all the time worked they will simply limit their work week to 40 hours or work a different pay formula.
What this truly will do is force companies not to abuse the employees who they offered a weekly salary based on fixed hours but work them longer. It is an open schedule; you know when you come to work but you don't know when you are leaving and may even be called in on days off. A 40 or 50 hour agreed work week turns into 60, 70 or more hours with no additional pay.
I know this because as an ex Winn Dixie employee in managerial positions I bucked heads all the time with upper management by refusing to accept salaried positions because that is exactly what was done. The only way I knew I would work as scheduled was by staying on the clock. Overtime was too painful for them to bear. When there was a need for me to work overtime I did and got paid. When they saw my paycheck, they made sure not to do it again. That was my guarantee that I would not be abused. I retired from Winn Dixie with 37 years of service. I worked as store manager in a salary position in the early 70's for two years. I got out of that job and made sure never to do it again.
This over working of employees condition exist mostly in retail and restaurants, especially with salaried low level managers in such places as Mc Donald's and Burger King and many others.
What this law may do is force companies to hire more employees to fill in the gap of those who no longer will work unlimited hours. Another way of looking at it is that the law will not increase the yearly wage but they may get paid more hourly by simply getting the same pay while working fewer hours.
Having said that the below is most likely what will happen in most jobs.
Example: John gets a salary of $615 per week or $31,980 a year on a 40 hour weekly schedule equivalent to $15 an hour. The company was actually working him 50 hours per week thus bringing his hourly wage down to $12 per hour.
There are different ways that companies could solve this problem without cutting the employees pay and getting around the law. One of them is by taking John off the salaried position and putting him back on the clock, pay him $11 an hour and give him 10 hours of overtime.
Weekly waged 40 hours x $11 = $ 440
Overtime 10 hours at $17.50 = $ 175
$440 + $175= $615
And there you have it; nothing changed as far as the pay but it may force corporations to be less abusive.
There is much controversy of the recent Supreme Court ruling on homosexuality and it understandable. Is this the end of the world? Certainly not and read some of the history here. Although not entirely most of the opposition comes from our nation's Christian ideology. Homosexuality received its illegality and declaration of immorality with the founding of Christianity by Emperor Constantine and it's closely followed cousin also Abrahamic derived religion of Islam. Homosexuality is as old as prostitution and has been accepted and practiced by humanity likely from the bingining of times.
Outside of greed and power humans are mostly guided by emotions, ideologies, common sense reality, and a combination among them or all of the three. Where people stand on this subject greatly depends on their own inner structure.
It does not take a genius to figure out that:
A same sex union relationship spiritually and emotionally has no barriers.
It is ideology mainly coming from religion that forbids such unions.
Common sense and reality provides us with the complete heterosexual relationship where we can find the emotional, ideological and the physical compatibility.
We live within our own limitations.
What we have on this subject is in some instances a matter of choice and in others a behavior based on existential needs and limitations. We humans naturally want it all but settle for what is easy or what we can get and this is normal behavior; lucky those who can have it all.
Having said this, it would not be fair and honest to give homosexuality a free pass. Both homosexuality and prostitution have a history of perversion and abuse. This is evident on the perverted behavior demonstrated by some homosexuals, mostly males and in the forced prostitution of females as well as males, especially with children. We cannot ignore hundreds of year's behavior of Catholic priests and their homosexual pedophilia abuse of young boys. And we cannot either turn a blind eye of the hypocrisy of the church leadership that knew of it and condoned it while telling the followers to abstain from such. Let us also remember that when discovered they tried to cover it up.
Where I admit not to favor such national shift as an obvious non-emotional realist that prefers it all, I am inclined to believe that the lesser of two evils is a shift away from ideology which is the main controller of humanity.
Religious opponents should not be surprised as it is written:
Ecclesiastes 1:9 - What has been will be again, what has been done will be done again; there is nothing new under the sun.
My overall view is of a well done movie which deserves a rating of 8 in a scale of 10. I like to watch as entertainment war packed action movies and this one offers it. Two of my other favorite war movies are "We Were Soldiers" and "Blackhawk Down". They are also based on a true story as is "American Sniper". They all share something in common and they raise the same question: What in hell were we doing there sacrificing the lives of young Americans?
I commend Clint Eastwood and Bradley Cooper for the production of this film.
They say that beauty is in the eyes of the beholder which is true due to selective seeing. During this process we blind ourselves of those things that do no appeal and only see those that do.
Did you not hear the sentiment of most Americans at the 1 hour 32 minute mark during the conversation between Kyle and his wife when he says" I love to serve my country" which by this point had turn into the wish for revenge of a friend that had been killed and she replies, "that's bullshit... I need you to be human again".
One of the things that enrages and motivates Kyle (22 minute mark) is the terrorist act of 9/11 as he looks enraged while watching it unfold on television. Of course many still believe the lie that Islamic foreigners were responsible and attacked our nation but I and millions of more Americans know better. So here we have false motivation and inspiration in joining an unjust and deceptive cause.
I found of most significance the scene in which a mother and a child are driven into committing suicide walking into a force they certainly knew could not defeat. What would have been the driving force behind it other than the grief and desperation of having lost a husband and a father fighting and dying against an occupying force? A sense of emptiness and loss of all hope finding themselves without his protection in such chaotic and harsh environment brought about by the people who lay in front of them. At this point we can also question if a shoot to kill shot was really necessary.
Do you see the de-humanization of the individual and that of the many whose bodies and minds have been scarred forever? Do you see the grieving families? And can you sense the burden of carrying responsibility for the cold blooded killing of 160 fellow humans who did not even see it coming?
Chris like many others are the typical naive and religious American raised in the ignorance that this is our country and in order to defend it we must wage war whenever those who really own it deem it necessary.
I have read raving reviews and comments from those who saw this movie as an inspiration and illustration of the patriotism and valor of our soldiers. This is indeed illustrated on this film but did we not also see the discontent, fear, manipulation, the suffering and grieving of the families. Do we not see the ignorance that motives young Americans who volunteer their lives and future to serve those who wage war to the people of another nation? These Iraqi people our soldiers fight kill and die for are fellow humans who suffer and fear and display the heroism of fighting the occupation of foreigners in the same way we would fight those who would occupy ours. War is heartless and ruthless and those who some may see portrayed as savages are freedom fighters resisting an invading and occupying force. Any other perspective can only be represented as brainwash as if we would not react in the same way.
I could make this much longer but this should be enough for anyone who is not blinded to see that this movie although such is displayed, it was not about a heroic American but about the horrors of war that victimizes and destroy the lives of young Americans and their families while bringing destruction, fear and death to the people of a nation who had done absolutely nothing to us and heroically do what Americans would do if our nation was invaded by foreigners.
I keep hearing on this subject and will try to put it to rest at least to those open minded enough to see with their own eyes and not by the words of others. I will hold no punches though and I am certainly not inspired by prejudice but by truth.
Is it in reality previous slavery, the Civil War, Southerner's prejudice, ignorance, the Confederate flag or incidents such as the recent Charleston SC shooting what is dividing America among racial lines? Are these the real and only culprits of the racial strife in our nation or are there other factors?
Truth is that the descendants of African slaves in our nation for the many reasons that I will not touch here developed a culture and behavior different than any other black person in the world. This of course does not apply to all but it does so to the majority. Whether justifiable or I will not debate it here butthere is a cultural and behavioral resentment that still resides within the majority of the black American community that one do not find in others.
We are a nation founded by Caucasians and that is the basis for our traditions and identity. No matter what race or culture the basis for their being, traditions and heritage in general is something that universally humans like to protect and retain. So let us not try to pretend in spite of efforts made by the controllers of our nation that such protection is not natural human behavior. Personally I think that in spite of the diversity in our nation we can live and coexist together and in harmony if we are not deliberately pinned against each other. And don't be fooled that their rhetoric of inclusiveness is authentic, they thrive by dividing us.
Having said the above I will move on with the main point that I am trying to make. The best example that our nation still enforces Jim Crow's laws can be best described with the election of Barack Obama as the first black president and by his own admission that he is black.
Well, the truth is that Barack Obama is black not because he is but because Jim Crow said that he would forever be. Common sense would tell us that a person with a Negroid father and a Caucasian mother cannot be either. For hundreds of years and until today except in our nation such person's race would be Mulato.
As described in the dictionary: Mulato - A person having one White and one Black parent.
This brings the question of why Barack Obama is referred to as black and not as a Mulato. In fact I wrote an article on this issue in July of 2008 when Barack Obama was running as a "black president" and you can find it here. There are millions of Mulato Americans that are referred to and identify themselves as blacks. Without knowing their family history all we have to do is look at them to recognize that prominent Americans such as Collin Powell and Louis Farrakhan fit in this category and they are in reality Mulato and not Black.
It is recognized in other nations that a Mulato person who conceives children with a white person uninterrupted for 3 or 4 generations his-her race is changed to white. However in America that may not be the case. According to Jim Crow's law as long as that person has Black in their genes (an ounce of blood) he-she will continue to be black. In fact the term Mulato was used in America in pre-Jim Crow's laws and became abolished with it.
Recently our media and government propaganda will have you believing that only Southerners displaying a Confederate flag are racially prejudist or racist but is it true?
We don't have to dig deep into our past to see all of the recent killing of blacks by police or look into Jim Crow's laws. All we have to do is look at the segregation by the Federal government of black soldiers that fought during WWII. We can also look at the Federal Tuskegee experimental syphilis injection of blacks. And we can go all the way to the Supreme Court to hear what Ruth Ginsberg said about abortion and "those who we don't want to have too many of".
So my question is: If Jim Crow's laws are no longer in effect on a national and Federal level then why is Barack Obama black?
Caucasian? Do not feel left out as our world belongs to rich white people that may not even belong to the human species. We all are financially segregated. The problem with humanity is that most believe everything they are told, get easily side tracked and can't remember anything that happened yesterday.
Really, if not because of our government why is this girl black?
When you go down that road it is universal and whoever owes you, must also be forgiven. This translates on today's intricate chain reaction world of finances that if you don't pay you will not be paid either. So what happens to Social Security, pensions, and so on?
I know that some will claim to be debt free and I say not so fast. Just visit the US Debt clock here and understand that the US debt is our debt which although it will never be able to pay, theoretically as in Greece they intend to tax us in order to honor it. The individual citizen debt is $57,920 and per family $154,336.
Greeks are living under conditions that may be worse than the US Great Depression of the 30's. Yet those who rule our world insist that they must pay what they owe although it is understood that they can't.
Self-imposed debt forgiveness in Greece is taking place.
How could banks foreclose on 70% of mortgages to then resale them to people who will not pay them? Is the only solution debt forgiveness and clear deeds?
Debt forgiveness is not a new concept. We can see that Jesus spoke about and its practice goes back 5,000 years.
"If peasants were unable to pay off their debts, they could also find themselves reduced to the condition of serfs or slaves; indebtedness could also lead to members of their family being made slaves. In order to ensure social peace and stability, and especially to prevent peasants' living conditions from deteriorating, the authorities periodically cancelled all debt and restored peasants' rights."
This concept was changed in modern times when the Rothschild banking system was established in 1769 and you can read its history in the below link. Not only they are unwilling to consider debt cancellation but have charged interest on money they created out of nothing. http://www.iamthewitness.com/DarylBradfordSmith_Rothschild.htm
Usury is rejected by the principles of Christianity and Islam.
Usury in Christianity
"Despite its Judaic roots, the critique of usury was most ferverently taken up as a cause by the institutions of the Christian Church where the debate prevailed with great intensity for well over a thousand years. The Old Testament decrees were resurrected and a New Testament reference to usury added to fuel the case. Building on the authority of these texts, the Roman Catholic Church had by the fourth century AD prohibited the taking of interest by the clergy; a rule which they extended in the fifth century to the laity. In the eighth century under Charlemagne, they pressed further and declared usury to be a general criminal offence. This anti-usury movement continued to gain momentum during the early Middle Ages and perhaps reached its zenith in 1311 when Pope Clement V made the ban on usury absolute and declared all secular legislation in its favour, null and void."
The Christian church apparently did a reversal on usury after cutting a deal with the Rothschild with the creation of the "Illuminati".
Governments and humanity have a debt burden that cannot be repaid. Yet, bankers continue their futile approach that they must pay. I don't have the answer on how to resolve this problem but let it be no doubt that the debt must be erased simply because it cannot be repaid and a reset of the entire financial system must take place. And, those who were should no longer be the controllers of humanity.
It all may sound good but having said the above, in reality it is not even conceivable for humanity to be freed. It is ruled and controlled by an inconceivable and vast conspiracy that is not hidden but in sight of anyone who wants to dig deep into it. The truth is only concealed by humanity unwillingness to accept that we are slaves. There is no Democracy, there is no freedom and there is no US Constitution or at least one that is followed. It is all a make believe world so that we cooperate. They learned that slaves are more productive if they think they are free and are given the basic needs.
This is a long but very comprehensible article for anyone interested. Did you ever hear the term "Black Pope"?
Bonus reading as example of how intricate and far reaching the conspiracy is on our own turf: Luis Freeh FBI Director 1993-2001.
Rain is a gift from nature, or God depending on the individual views. As we well know, it is indispensable for supporting human life and communities. Humans sensibly do not build large communities where it does not rain or rain accesses the community. The word deserted derives from what we know as arid deserts. Humans thru time have migrated as rain patterns changed and thus abandoning or deserting communities. Cities and communities like Los Angeles, Las Vegas and others are no different and the people will be forced to leave them if the water runs out. In fact, apparently aware of this, the more affluent and knowledgeable which are always the first in escaping disasters have been leaving California for some time.
This has actually been a very profitable business transaction for some. In addition it has always been beyond my comprehension why anyone would buy a piece of property on top of the San Andreas Fault. This if not on top, it comes close to being the epitome of ignorance. Apparently a hand full of wealthy people managed to sell millions of scam victims what they knew ahead of time was an unsustainable habitat in a desert rocked by earthquakes. Having reached the limit of what it can support California may very well return to its original state.
Perhaps a slower process, but migration has also occurred with the Ages constant change of oceanic levels. The likelihood exist that for some period of time in the near future (decades or centuries) the oceans will slowly rise. This may force those living in low coastal areas to migrate on higher land. Cities such as New York, New Orleans, Miami and many others may experience this change of pattern. Deniability or acceptance is likely a self-interest argument as these cycles are indeed a constant natural process. In the same pattern as with California, some affluent and influential individuals will remain on the deniability side while quietly heading for the exits spearing the loss of property value. Left behind and as usually trapped will be the ignorant and the poor that will gradually see themselves inhabiting worthless swamps.
Aquifers and rivers are replenished from rain. If you to take an area such as the US Midwest we find it to possess an aquifer that would suffice for farming in order to feed the citizens of our nation and perhaps others for centuries to come. The arable land of the Midwest is one of our most important natural resources but the below ground aquifer is being depleted thru unsustainable and excessive farming. Corporations are drying out the Midwest Ogallala aquifer. You can read a short version here or a longer version here.
If for profit corporations that do not represent the best interest of the American people are allowed to use this land for feeding much of the world and for growing corn to be use as bio-fuels then we will deplete that aquifer that feeds us. Why our elected leaders allow this to happen is another subject for another day that we can better understand if we become acquainted with the Machiavellian concept of ruling nations. ".Machiavelli says this may mean doing bad but necessary things which people do not see or remember". It sounds familiar; does it not?
According to those who rule humanity and wisely stated in the short clip below from the movie Network: "There are no people, there are no nations.there are only Dollars." and of course humanity is ruled by those who hold a lot of them.
The California drought has been referred to as unprecedented but is it really?
The below is what is really unprecedented and why California has run out of water.
Most will not understand or ignore this and dismiss it as it not being their business or of importance but stop for a second and think of the implications of what will happen to you, your family, friends, fellow citizens, the nation. if our government could not borrow what it needs to support one sixth of its obligations. Could they make payments to Social Security and pensions, replenish EBT cards.? How many jobs would they cut? What kind of chaotic civil unrest would something of this nature bring?
The summary of the story on liquidity is that the amount of money needed by governments to be borrowed in order to finance their deficits is drying out and it will have major implications on the financial system and the markets. The alarm has been sounding loud on the liquidity issue and it can be read here.
There is also the theory of the seven year crisis cycle and the last was in 2008 which makes 2015 the candidate for the next crisis. Read this article.
Basically what this banker is saying is that banks should put all of their money into bankrupted government's bonds in order to keep the game going a little longer and during the process leave the ATMs empty. Either way it likely won't matter because history proves that the life of paper money is short and it has always become worthless. Forget about the FDIC guarantees in deposits. If a private insurance company promised what the FDIC does they would be shut down and the officials thrown in prison. The FDIC claims to guarantee over 300 times the amount of money that is has available. Look it up in their website as they claim to guarantee $9 trillion but their funds are $25 billion. Visit this link for a graphic example of the disproportion.
Paper money is of no real value, it is a "banknote" which is given value by being supported with precious metals but since 1971 the US stopped supporting the Dollar with precious metals and since it has lost much of its value. Even with huge efforts by the bankers of suppressing the real value of gold against the Dollar gold surged from $40 an ounce in 1971 to $1,200 today. Gold is today worth 30 times more that it was then and that figure could go exponential when the next crisis arrives.
There is a misconception on the 1971 Gold Standard event that is attributed to then President Richard Nixon. Knowing what we know today it would be silly and naive to think that a stooge president which has no authority over monetary policies was truly responsible for this. As the elected president he validated the decision with his signature but rest assured that this was a Federal Reserve owner's decision. "In 1967, future Federal Reserve Chairman Alan Greenspan warned that leaving the gold standard would leave Americans vulnerable to forces that would devalue everything they own". "Damned if you do, damned if you don't" we could guess.
The crash of fiat currency is nothing new and it has happened to many other nations before because eventually it happens to all of fiat currencies. When it happens to the Dollar it of course will not be the end of America but certainly the end of the one as we knew it.
First they moved manufacturing overseas, and then they outsourced services and now we will be replaced in our own turf. Read here about the Trade in Services Agreement or TISA. This is a US international agreement that will do just that. It is our elected officials serving their masters which will make such possible. If you take the time to read the article and learn from such it will be thanks to Wiki Leaks and not to our government or media.
If you feel left out and confused about what is taking place in our nation, about our nation's governing process, are concerned about our government's actions in regard to international treaties, laws passed that have no constitutionality and more you are simply in denial that the US is a corporation owned by an international oligarchy. Americans only hold one share of stock each thus only hold one vote and as long as we remain purposely divided we will never have a say. There are no secrets as everything is within public view for those who care to know. It is the public which chooses to remain blinded and ignorant living in a make belief world that does not exist. Watch it clearly stated in the example below.
In this article we hear about Florida Senator Bill Nelson bullshitting Americans about Disney hiring foreigners to replace American workers in what appears to be compliance with the TISA international treaty that he must have certainly signed. Take note that this is just the beginning of this and a trial in order to see Americans reaction. As usual most Americans will whine, complain, criticize but accomplish nothing because without knowledge, truth and action all of which are needed we will remain at the mercy of a government that does not work for the people. The system will continue to work for oligarchs as long as they keep the people from going hungry and that is all they intend to do as the financial world that they created crumbles.
It is all clearly stated on this other article that you should not miss reading "the US is a plantation and we the people are slaves". Again, it is all open to the public and shared by those who live in the real world but denied by those who want to whine and complain while choosing to live in a non-existent artificial world.
Americans would have been able to much clearly see by now our real world if they would have long accepted what many of their fellow Americans have been saying about the September 11th conspiracy. Architects and engineers do not design steel and concrete skyscraper that will collapse under fire. It just does not happen and in modern history in spite of many fires only happened to three buildings, on the same place and on the same day one of which was not even hit by a plane. Those who want to cling to the lie will accept that steel with a melting point of 2,500 degrees melted as the result of 900 degree office fires while also ignoring that concrete remains in chunks and does not turn into a cloud of dust.
Believing the given official story is the naive acceptance of more bullshit fed by the American Media and corrupted politicians. Take notice that several elected officials came clean on this and their political careers were ended. Cynthia McKinney ex-Congresswoman.
Most Americans will cling on to lies in order to keep their political and religious ideologies from collapsing. It is the fear of facing and living in a world that they do not understand. Their accomplishment will be whatever whining will provide them which won't be much. Only learning and sharing the knowledge can make a difference and that is the choice that any truly caring citizen must make. Jump the herd; if you can.
Sorry but Minnie and Mickey do not speak English.
Truth is that this is possible because money permits it. The article in the inserted link from Time.com lists 5 things but in reality there is only one (read the Time article here).
"Over 80% of all financial transactions worldwide are conducted in dollars, as are 87% of foreign currency market transactions. As long as the world continues to place such faith in America's currency and overall economic stability, the U.S. economy remains the one to beat."
The banking oligarchy gave us the currency of the world (the Dollar). Our government and politicians do not have the power or authority to do such and us the American people certainly not. Our nation and government does not control our foreign owned Central Bank which is the Federal Reserve. We were given the Dollar to be printed at will so that we would serve them, and we have served them well by fighting all of their wars for dominance. It is propaganda that our much praised soldiers have served us; they have served them, and still do. The oligarchy has only thrown their crumbs at us in order to keep us obedient and in servitude.
The Dollar is dying and with its death will also die our ability to protect the banking oligarchy and the benefits that we ripped from it. Soon we will no longer be of much use to them and our lives will change. We can clearly see that presently our government is no longer trying to impose its way by refusing involvement in another war. Our elected leaders are cutting deals wherever they can in order to avoid a catastrophe. Examples are the P5+1 and the TTP agreements.
All that remains is a big "if" for the Dollar remaining king as it is clearly stated in the inserted links. The world is preparing to replace the Dollar. There is no faith left in any paper currency but at the moment that is all there is. Nations are accumulating Gold and at least for some time Gold will likely become the basis of currency again. It has been the main store of value for the past 5,000 years and it will continue to be. Unfortunately for us, our elected leaders have no clue if the US Gold Reserves claimed by the Federal Reserve even exist and a world audit would be required in order to participate in any future currency. If we don't have the alleged gold reserves we will be even in deeper trouble.
The only thing that has kept the American economy stable during the past 7 years is the $3 trillion that the Federal Reserve dumped into it. So it can be better understood this figure is $3 million millions. This $3 trillion not only did not help much but it cannot continue to be done forever. This money would have been enough to pay all of the student loan debt; all credit card debt held by Americans and still have close to a trillion left. If they had use that money to forgive Americans debt we would have kicked off the economy in high gear but that is not how bankers operate; they don't forgive the debt they sale us from money created out of nothing.
Stop believing the illusion of a recovery and that we can go on with the existing burden of deficit and debt forever. Instead find out what to do and how best prepare for when reality hits. It is a certainty that tomorrow will come and likely sooner than most expect.
Honest economists and financial forecasters have been saying that the Dollar is toast.
The current DC debate on a provision of the NSA mass communication collection has little to do with the privacy of Americans. Tens of millions of Americans already give them their day to day life events and views on Facebook and other media sources voluntarily. There is no privacy. If you want to know anyone's life history just pay the $30 to organizations that access public records and you can have anyone's life history in minutes without the assistance of the NSA.
The millions of Americans who have done the homework understand that the False Flag attack of 9/11 had nothing to do with terrorism and everything to do with foreign policy. Understand that the Patriot Act and NSA mass communication collection was not about the threat of terrorism and has much to do with population control.
The Patriot Act was passed five days after the 9/11 false flag attack which clearly means it was written long before in anticipation to 9/11. All they needed was 9/11 to sell it to the people. With it Americans also bought the wars that they needed in order to push their foreign policy which Americans otherwise would not have approved of.
This deceiving debate in Washington is not about abolishing the Patriot Act it is about a provision that distracts the people and fools them into thinking that major changes are taking place with the unconstitutional Patriot Act and that their freedoms are restored. This is little more than politicians jockeying for Americans support in the 2016 elections. When this show is over no matter what comes out of it nothing will have changed for Americans who now live under the grip of a Police State. Everything appears to be fine until some decide to protest justifiable causes such as abuses in the banking industry and Wall Street or police brutality then the Military Police roles out its Humvees, weapons, body armor gear, pepper spray, tear gas and quickly reminds you that it is the people who pay them their salaries who are in charge and not you. That is what the Patriot Act allows and what needs to be repealed.
Wake up and stop playing the deception game for truth is in plain sight. Their game can only go on as long as you are willing to play it. If you refuse to play, the game will end. The people do not have the freedom that they want or was promised in the US Constitution; they have the freedom that they are allowed to have by unelected rulers. If we are not going to do anything to change it at least let us live in the real world and accept this truth.
You are free as long as you agree.
On this day we honor our most abused citizen; the American soldier. And while many whine, cry and praise their sacrifice they also support the unjustified wars in which they are sacrificed while not having the vaguest idea of why they fight. In honesty ask yourself this question: What did the Viet Nam, Afghanistan and Iraq wars have to do with preserving our Freedom when our freedoms are under attack from within? That being the case our soldiers lost their lives while fighting the wrong enemies. Honor the American soldier by asking yourself; what have I done to stop the wars and the sacrifice?
We can begin with the present as the US Veterans Administration Affairs is accused and found guilty of neglect by not assuming properly its responsibility to oversee the treatment of veterans and post war health issues. In their defense let us also recognize the tremendous task and expense of offering assistance to the veterans of a nation that is constantly involved in endless and senseless wars. Americans did not support the numerous wars of the past 100 years but they were fought anyway.
Let us get a true view of how the people who formulate American Foreign Policy and conduct wars see the "American Soldier":
Secretary of State Henry Kissinger as an agent of the western oligarchy that he serves explained it with 15 words, but few seem to understand it or remember it long enough:
"Military men are 'dumb, stupid animals to be used' as pawns for foreign policy." The quote is found in "Final Days," a book by Bob Woodward and Carl Bernstein. Kissinger has never disputed the statement.
Let us also see how those who rule our world see war:
"If my sons did not want wars, there would be none."
Americans strongly opposed involvement in WWI and WWII but they were dragged into them in order to protect the interest of a few. Most only know the official story of these wars but in depth study reveals an entire different picture. During WWII there were two fronts challenging the western banking oligarchy empire; the Pacific and the European fronts.
On the Pacific front we had the Pearl Harbor surprise attack. What the superficial and partial story does not mention is that the Japanese retaliated from an oil embargo which is considered an act of war with the attack on Pearl Harbor. The attack swayed public opinion towards WWII involvement. As we come to understand today about false flag attacks, deception and war propaganda we can also come to the understanding that the "surprise" attack on Pearl Harbor was not really a surprise. Thousands of sailors were sacrificed to enrage the American public and sway their sentiment in favor of war.
On the European front there is a truer truth and that being that the German government had declared war on the western banking oligarchy (very important read here). The only way the bankers could have defeated Germany war on bankers was if America joined the war against Germany. Ironically it is the same banking oligarchy that controls our nation today and has so since before the American Revolution (read it here). Today an unwinding of this appears to be taking place worldwide as they have bankrupted our nation and the world with an unsurmountable unpayable debt. Certainly there must have been a plan B that hopefully the world will reject.
The senseless Viet Nam War saw years of endless opposition and protest. Try finding a logical explanation on why it was fought. In fact this war was opposed by the elected president and we did not really get deeply involved until after his assassination. Think about it; had Kennedy lived likely there would have not been a Viet Nam war and our history would much defer. Apparently he opposed a foreign policy that had already been approved. This war was not fought entirely by volunteers as many who opposed it were drafted and sent to fight it. We can hardly see the later as a patriotic act. The Viet Nam war not only produced the death of over 58,000 and 211,000 wounded young American soldiers but a generation where many were not able to again adapt to society. It took our Congress 25 years to recognize the claims of health issues by the many that were affected by Agent Orange which you can read about here.
The wars of the 21st Century; what are they about? It would be nice if someone could explain them but no one really can although there are some things that we can clearly see. The war in Afghanistan was about a man (Osama Bin Laden) who is already dead and Al Qaeda in Afghanistan which no longer exist. So why are we still there? It is clear that the only thing of any value in Afghanistan is the biggest world production of heroin run by the western oligarchy which profits from it. Osama Bin Laden was by the oligarchs owned media falsely accused as the FBI acknowledges here of the September 11th attack. It was a banker's foreign policy that did not have Americans support but it was swayed with a false flag attack. The latter then evolved into the Iraqi war which never really had support in spite of the WMDs false propaganda.
Let us be realistic that voluntarism arises from the need of poor Americans of a job, college education, medical and other benefits the military offers. That is how the armed forces draw participation. For others it is just an adventure. In today's military Patriotism come as the result of propaganda by mostly those on the outside who would not consider joining. "Yeah, honor the death and sacrifice of our soldiers because one certainly wasn't foolish enough or had the need to join and participate in the wars". Young Americans volunteer because they need a job, want that college education they cannot afford, are loaded with testosterone and want a license to kill, a rush or an adventure and perhaps because their wife or girlfriend just got pregnant and they have no means of paying for the delivery. What does patriotism has to do with killing innocent people all over the planet?
The good news is that apparently the Pentagon has pulled off the rug and is resisting further war involvement which is why now the banking oligarchy relies on Saudi Arabia, ISIS and ISIL to do their dirty war work.
True we need a national armed force for our protection but that is not what the bulk of Americans have been supporting. Honor our soldiers by ridding of propaganda ignorance and find the truth behind wars. Tens of thousands of US soldiers have died because too many supported unnecessary wars.
The question to ask is not what the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) contains but where it originated. "Tell me who your friends are and I will tell you who you are". Basically by looking at the list of signatory and those interested in being members it becomes obvious that it is not a world treaty. It is basically a treaty that will try to align nations where the British, the Rothschild and the Rockefeller Empire have most influence and business dealings. See the list here. Not showing interest is the European Continent, Russia, China, India, Brazil. or what amounts to most of the world. A deal like this supports certain clients and not the best deal. Let us say that you own a business and can get a certain supply at a good price from certain dealer but under contract are you are obligated to purchase form the contract dealer at a higher price. This pretty much is what the TPP contains without having to look at it.
This treaty is designed so that signatory nations maintain loyalty to the shrinking Empire. Certainly it is not to the advancement of sovereignty but to the preservation of what is left of the Empire.
All one has to do is see that the treaty originates in the nation of Brunei as an original signatory in June 2005. This is a nation that likely 99.9% of American never heard about. Brunei is the 5th wealthiest nation in the world and in addition debt free. How can a nation be so lucky while the rest of the world drowns in debt incurred from the Rothschild Empire Central Banking system? The only logical answer is that they own it.
Brunei is the Switzerland of the Pacific. Just as Switzerland was spared from WWII so was Brunei when the British and the Rothschild cut a deal with the Japanese. "Once the Japanese occupied Brunei, they made an agreement with Sultan Ahmad Tajuddin over governing the country. Inche Ibrahim (known later as Pehin Datu Perdana Menteri Dato Laila Utama Awang Haji Ibrahim), a former Secretary to the British Resident, Ernest Edgar Pengilly, was appointed Chief Administrative Officer under the Japanese Governor."
Read the inserted links and see that this is indeed a treaty with the British Empire, the Rothschild and the Rockefellers and then decide if our nation should be part of it or not.
Yes, the Obama administration pulled a theatrical lie and sold it to the same Americans who naively pretty much buy any lie for sale. The recently publicized Seymour Hersh story while labeling it as a denunciation of a lie is actually the same lie told differently.
Little of what we are told is true and the best option is not to believe anything we are told unless it can be verified. "Hearsay" is not good enough and leads to a taught opinion instead of a thought opinion. We are a nation of mindless talking parrots that repeat what we are told by a bunch of manipulative liars while having no clue of what we are saying. Ironically although most do not believe that they are told the truth by government or by the media they perpetrate the stories by mindlessly repeating them.
This Bin Laden story which was already dead comes back alive by so called investigative reporter Seymour Hersh. He is apparently just an insider propagandist dressed up as a reporter and his recent comment about the killing of Osama Bin Laden is nothing more than propaganda entertainment to support the media with another made up story. Thru his career as a reported Hersh has faced criticism for his use of anonymous sources. We can translate that into "it may be a lie but I am not the one who said it".
The original story come from an interview with The Guardian (here) in which he speaks on writing a book and a chapter is dedicated as to questioning the killing of Osama Bin Laden. The perpetrators of the propaganda lies are just monopolizing it and using it to entertain the audience with it one more time and continue to embed the original lie in the minds of the people. If Hersh was a true investigative reporter he should have long ago investigated and written on the lie of September 11th.Yes, he is right that the killing of Osama Bin Laden was a big lie but so is supporting most of the story which he does while calling it a lie.
Osama Bin Laden had long been dead. With a $25 million bounty and the most sophisticated ever intelligence agencies supposedly looking for him why would anyone believe that Bin Laden could have survived 11 years while in plain site?
"The man who murdered Osama Bin Laden" Benazir Bhutto
Another opinion by a CIA operative on earlier death of Bin Laden
Osama Bin Laden had long been dead but was needed alive to continue public support for the wars under the label of "The War on Terror". What the Obama administration did was to close that lying chapter with another lie. Special Force killing instead of capturing alive the person who according to the lie was the best source of information on Al Qaeda makes no sense at all. To make the operation even more unprofessional they dump the body in the ocean. In the absence of a body his capture or death cannot be proved or disproved. How convenient right?
The below is the best satirical worth watching piece made on the killing of Osama Bin Laden myth.